> Am 27.05.2015 um 16:31 schrieb Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net>: > >> On 05/26/2015 03:03 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> Ok, I understand now. That said I don't see how implementing STFLE will >> break that. I think it will actually improve things by enabling more >> facilities and thus making the kernel happier (but maybe not enough). > > Somewhat amusingly, by not implementing STFLE we bypass this check. > > >>> #elif defined(CONFIG_MARCH_Z990) >>> .long 1, 0xc0002000 >> >> For this one we only miss one instruction in the LD facility. I have it >> on my TODO list, though it might take a few weeks until it goes to the >> top. > > Which one? > >>> #elif defined(CONFIG_MARCH_Z900) >>> .long 1, 0xc0000000 >> >> This corresponds to the current value we provide. CONFIG_MARCH_Z900 also >> correspond to the configuration of the Debian kernel, that's why I am >> able to boot kernels. > > Ah, well that's something. Fedora defaults to z9-109, and I think SuSE does > the same.
Unfortunately SLE12 has its ALS on z196, so there's quite a bit more work necessary ;) Alex > > > r~
