On 05/26/2015 03:03 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Ok, I understand now. That said I don't see how implementing STFLE will > break that. I think it will actually improve things by enabling more > facilities and thus making the kernel happier (but maybe not enough).
Somewhat amusingly, by not implementing STFLE we bypass this check. >> #elif defined(CONFIG_MARCH_Z990) >> .long 1, 0xc0002000 > > For this one we only miss one instruction in the LD facility. I have it > on my TODO list, though it might take a few weeks until it goes to the > top. > Which one? >> #elif defined(CONFIG_MARCH_Z900) >> .long 1, 0xc0000000 > > This corresponds to the current value we provide. CONFIG_MARCH_Z900 also > correspond to the configuration of the Debian kernel, that's why I am > able to boot kernels. Ah, well that's something. Fedora defaults to z9-109, and I think SuSE does the same. r~
