On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 08:53 +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote: > > Hrm, OK. I suppose we can live with autodetect and igd both meaning igd > > and whoever adds a new type will have to remember to add a check for > > qemu-trad then. > > > > When we really have to introduce a new type, this means we probably need > to change something inside qemu codes. So a new type should just go into > that table to support qemu upstream since now we shouldn't refactor > anything in qemu-xen-traditional, right?
We'd want to error out on attempts to use qemu-xen-trad with non-IGD passthru. Ian.
