On Mi, 2015-03-04 at 08:27 +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > > > On 4 March 2015 at 00:07, Marcel Apfelbaum <mar...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> In the mean time this series depends on Igor's ACPI dynamic series that > >> took > >> a lot of time to review and even Michael's PULL request with it is not yet > >> in master. > > > > You can view this as an argument against enormous pull requests > > with nearly a hundred patches in them -- they're much more likely > > to hit multiple issues in submission with minor things that need > > fixing, simply because of their size... > > Yes. The current PCI pull request is clearly too big for its own > good.
... and it has non-pci stuff in there too. Guess it would make sense to split stuff into multiple queues (acpi, pc, acpi, virtio, ...). Helps to keep the size reasonable. I think it works better overall, even if it is annoying at times when there are patch dependencies between branches. cheers, Gerd
