Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes:
> On 4 March 2015 at 00:05, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 03/03/2015 16:03, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>>>> > Maybe we have a candidate now. That function doesn't seem easy to
>>>> > replace, and it is pretty useful.
>>> Looking at git history there were a number of followup fixes
>>> where 2.13-2.22 function couldn't be used, if we switch to 2.24
>>> we could cleanup that places also.
>>
>> Peter mentioned above that 2.22 is a bit awkward to him, and he's
>> already swamped enough that we should consider doing him a favor. :)
>
> More to the point, Cornelia pointed out that SLES 11 SP 3 is still
> on 2.22.
>
> I guess I don't object to moving forward to 2.22 if somebody wants
> to write the configure patch and add the info to the release notes.
The commit comment for configure:
glib_req_ver=2.12
States it's the version found in RHEL5. Do we not care about that
anymore? I guess at some point the enterprise distros are only
backporting fixes to an old qemu anyway.
(/me is all for newer glibs btw, there are some handy features)
>
> -- PMM
--
Alex Bennée
