On 4 March 2015 at 00:05, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 03/03/2015 16:03, Igor Mammedov wrote: >>> > Maybe we have a candidate now. That function doesn't seem easy to >>> > replace, and it is pretty useful. >> Looking at git history there were a number of followup fixes >> where 2.13-2.22 function couldn't be used, if we switch to 2.24 >> we could cleanup that places also. > > Peter mentioned above that 2.22 is a bit awkward to him, and he's > already swamped enough that we should consider doing him a favor. :)
More to the point, Cornelia pointed out that SLES 11 SP 3 is still on 2.22. I guess I don't object to moving forward to 2.22 if somebody wants to write the configure patch and add the info to the release notes. -- PMM