On 30 January 2015 at 10:54, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 30 January 2015 at 10:48, Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Long term though it will be much better of AArch64 would just do PCI >> instead of MMIO bus. Then we have proper device addressing which we >> can control in a predictable manner that will be stable across hotplug >> and unplug and migration. I hear there's work on PCI for AArch64 but >> is there a near term ETA yet ? > > I need to review Alex's v3 patchset; if it doesn't have any issues > it'll probably go into target-arm.next next week and hit mainline > shortly after that.
Incidentally if you have opinions about sensible minimum sizes of PCI ECAM and MMIO windows in the address space now would be a good time to air them. -- PMM
