On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 08:57:55PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 19/01/2015 20:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>> > > so we probably should apply anyway the patch of > >>> > > mine that allows the DSDT size to change; and we probably should pay > >>> > > attention to SSDT, and version it. > > Oh, missed that. > > You mean this: "Add padding after the DSDT"? > > Yes. > > > Right but e.g. Igor's patches likely move RSDT anyway, no? > > Yes, but for future machine types we can be more careful. > > Paolo
Yes absolutely, I'm not arguing against these patches. I was merely observing that they probably won't help with the specific problem. -- MST
