On 19/01/2015 20:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> > > so we probably should apply anyway the patch of >>> > > mine that allows the DSDT size to change; and we probably should pay >>> > > attention to SSDT, and version it. > Oh, missed that. > You mean this: "Add padding after the DSDT"?
Yes. > Right but e.g. Igor's patches likely move RSDT anyway, no? Yes, but for future machine types we can be more careful. Paolo
