On 05/11/2014 14:28, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > I think bypassing the question by converting to realize makes the most > > sense... > > I'm fine with doing that but Markus's patches wouldn't > yet have solved the problem by themselves since init > is still around, right? > > This probably means fixing this bug can't justify > merging the realize patchset after freeze.
Yes, I agree. I meant that the API is not very well defined. I would handle everything else on a case-by-case basis, by reviewing each init function that is converted to realize. Since the patch was for an out-of-tree device, it can wait for 2.3 anyway. Paolo
