On 31 October 2014 12:21, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:

> On 30 October 2014 21:28, Greg Bellows <greg.bell...@linaro.org> wrote:
> > From: Fabian Aggeler <aggel...@ethz.ch>
> >
> > When EL3 is running in AArch32 (or ARMv7 with Security Extensions)
> > PAR has a secure and a non-secure instance.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabian Aggeler <aggel...@ethz.ch>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Bellows <greg.bell...@linaro.org>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > v5 -> v6
> > - Changed _el field variants to be array based
> >
> > v3 -> v4
> > - Fix par union/structure definition
> > ---
> >  target-arm/cpu.h    | 10 +++++++++-
> >  target-arm/helper.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
> >  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/target-arm/cpu.h b/target-arm/cpu.h
> > index 10985d4..3c6ff4a 100644
> > --- a/target-arm/cpu.h
> > +++ b/target-arm/cpu.h
> > @@ -288,7 +288,15 @@ typedef struct CPUARMState {
> >              };
> >              uint64_t far_el[4];
> >          };
> > -        uint64_t par_el1;  /* Translation result. */
> > +        union { /* Translation result. */
> > +            struct {
> > +                uint64_t _unused_par_0;
> > +                uint64_t par_ns;
> > +                uint64_t _unused_par_1;
> > +                uint64_t par_s;
> > +            };
> > +            uint64_t par_el[4];
> > +        };
> >          uint32_t c9_insn; /* Cache lockdown registers.  */
> >          uint32_t c9_data;
> >          uint64_t c9_pmcr; /* performance monitor control register */
> > diff --git a/target-arm/helper.c b/target-arm/helper.c
> > index c4d0db4..ec957fb 100644
> > --- a/target-arm/helper.c
> > +++ b/target-arm/helper.c
> > @@ -1419,7 +1419,7 @@ static void ats_write(CPUARMState *env, const
> ARMCPRegInfo *ri, uint64_t value)
> >               * fault.
> >               */
> >          }
> > -        env->cp15.par_el1 = par64;
> > +        A32_BANKED_CURRENT_REG_SET(env, par, par64);
> >      } else {
> >          /* ret is a DFSR/IFSR value for the short descriptor
> >           * translation table format (with WnR always clear).
> > @@ -1429,14 +1429,16 @@ static void ats_write(CPUARMState *env, const
> ARMCPRegInfo *ri, uint64_t value)
> >              /* We do not set any attribute bits in the PAR */
> >              if (page_size == (1 << 24)
> >                  && arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V7)) {
> > -                env->cp15.par_el1 = (phys_addr & 0xff000000) | 1 << 1;
> > +                A32_BANKED_CURRENT_REG_SET(env, par,
> > +                        (phys_addr & 0xff000000) | 1 << 1);
> >              } else {
> > -                env->cp15.par_el1 = phys_addr & 0xfffff000;
> > +                A32_BANKED_CURRENT_REG_SET(env, par, phys_addr &
> 0xfffff000);
> >              }
> >          } else {
> > -            env->cp15.par_el1 = ((ret & (1 << 10)) >> 5) |
> > -                ((ret & (1 << 12)) >> 6) |
> > -                ((ret & 0xf) << 1) | 1;
> > +            A32_BANKED_CURRENT_REG_SET(env, par,
> > +                    ((ret & (1 << 10)) >> 5) |
> > +                    ((ret & (1 << 12)) >> 6) |
> > +                    ((ret & 0xf) << 1) | 1);
> >          }
>
> Pull the "uint64_t par64" out to the top level of this function, and
> set it in all the branches of the if() that currently set cp15.par_el1,
> and then just use the big fat A32_BANKED_CURRENT_REG_SET macro once.
>
>
Done in v9


> >      }
> >  }
> > @@ -1444,9 +1446,9 @@ static void ats_write(CPUARMState *env, const
> ARMCPRegInfo *ri, uint64_t value)
> >
> >  static const ARMCPRegInfo vapa_cp_reginfo[] = {
> >      { .name = "PAR", .cp = 15, .crn = 7, .crm = 4, .opc1 = 0, .opc2 = 0,
> > -      .access = PL1_RW, .resetvalue = 0,
> > -      .fieldoffset = offsetoflow32(CPUARMState, cp15.par_el1),
> > -      .writefn = par_write },
> > +      .access = PL1_RW, .resetvalue = 0, .writefn = par_write,
> > +      .bank_fieldoffsets = { offsetoflow32(CPUARMState, cp15.par_s),
> > +                             offsetoflow32(CPUARMState, cp15.par_ns) }
> },
>
> Why move the .writefn setting around?
>

I'm guessing Fabian is like me and likes things to be more orderly and
consistent.  He appears to have tidied certain things he touched and I
likely did as well.  The register definitions could use a clean-up to make
them more readable.  Perhaps something to attack after the TZ stuff is in.


>
> >  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> >      { .name = "ATS", .cp = 15, .crn = 7, .crm = 8, .opc1 = 0, .opc2 =
> CP_ANY,
> >        .access = PL1_W, .accessfn = ats_access,
> > @@ -1902,8 +1904,9 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo lpae_cp_reginfo[] = {
> >        .access = PL1_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST | ARM_CP_OVERRIDE,
> >        .resetvalue = 0 },
> >      { .name = "PAR", .cp = 15, .crm = 7, .opc1 = 0,
> > -      .access = PL1_RW, .type = ARM_CP_64BIT,
> > -      .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.par_el1), .resetvalue =
> 0 },
> > +      .access = PL1_RW, .type = ARM_CP_64BIT, .resetvalue = 0,
> > +      .bank_fieldoffsets = { offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.par_s),
> > +                             offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.par_ns)} },
> >      { .name = "TTBR0", .cp = 15, .crm = 2, .opc1 = 0,
> >        .access = PL1_RW, .type = ARM_CP_64BIT | ARM_CP_NO_MIGRATE,
> >        .bank_fieldoffsets = { offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.ttbr0_s),
> > --
> > 1.8.3.2
>
> Looks OK otherwise.
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>

Reply via email to