On 10/24/2014 01:12 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote: >> > I think we can keep the macros. The actual cleanup would be to have a >> > single member for the 32 512-bit ZMM registers, instead of splitting >> > xmm/ymmh/zmmh/zmm_hi16. This will get rid of the YMM_* and ZMM_* >> > registers. However, we could not use simple memcpy()s to marshal in and >> > out of the XSAVE data. > Agreed. I don't mind keeping those macros in this patch, as this is just > following the existing conventions in the code. Whatever we do to clean > that up, we can do it later. > >> > We can do it in 2.2. > You mean 2.3, or do you want to clean that up in this release?
I mean 2.3. Paolo
