On 23 October 2014 11:27, Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> wrote: > On 10/23/2014 02:09 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 23 October 2014 10:02, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> On 23 October 2014 09:09, Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> wrote: >>>> Applied to trivial (with subject fixup), thanks! >>> >>> Please don't -- as I said, I have a libvixl update in my queue, >>> and these will conflict. I'll apply an appropriate variation of >>> this patch to my target-arm tree. >> >> ...or maybe I just *thought* I'd said that, since I can't find >> a mail in this thread where I did; sorry. > > You did, in a "v2" version. Which I overlooked really, and tried > to apply the original v1 (which has you reviewed-by as a temp. > workaround). Oh well.. :)
Oh yes. I actually prefer v1, so I've applied it (with a tweaked commit message) to target-arm.next. When libvixl 1.7 appears we can just drop this change. -- PMM
