Hi Peter, On 01/10/2014 17:32, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 1 October 2014 16:35, Leon Alrae <leon.al...@imgtec.com> wrote: >> I noticed that it's quite difficult to get target-mips changes >> reviewed/accepted. There is already a queue of relatively big features >> and bug fixes which are stuck for months. Does anyone have an idea how >> to improve this situation? Wouldn't it help to have a target-mips >> co-maintainer assisting Aurelien? > > I agree that an active co-maintainer for target-mips would > be a good idea. Is anybody volunteering? (Are you? :-))
I would be happy to help maintaining target-mips, but I'm wondering if there are any more experienced (especially in legacy MIPS) volunteers. > If somebody wants to take on this job, a good first start > would be to assemble a git tree of patches which have got > code review (ie which have accumulated at least one > reviewed-by tag and aren't the subject of on-list > disagreement about whether they're correct), test it, and > submit it as a pull request (in the right format, and with > your signed-off-by lines on the patches and any reviewed-by > or acked-by lines from the list)... If somebody does that > I will take a look at the result and if I'm happy with it > I'll apply them. Sounds straightforward, thanks. Regards, Leon
