Just change what I have used and looked into. There are no other special reasons.
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:05 AM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 4 September 2014 19:01, Chih-Min Chao <cmc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > CPUARMState is one of parameter used by > > is_a64 > > arm_feature > > arm_el_is_aa64 > > They only read it without any side effect and shold be changed to > > const parameter > > I guess, but we have lots of functions that just pass > around CPUARMState without it being const even if they > don't actually modify it; why change these ones in > particular? > > thanks > -- PMM >
