On 4 September 2014 19:01, Chih-Min Chao <cmc...@gmail.com> wrote: > CPUARMState is one of parameter used by > is_a64 > arm_feature > arm_el_is_aa64 > They only read it without any side effect and shold be changed to > const parameter
I guess, but we have lots of functions that just pass around CPUARMState without it being const even if they don't actually modify it; why change these ones in particular? thanks -- PMM
