On 1 September 2014 10:28, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > Il 01/09/2014 11:12, Peter Maydell ha scritto: >>> We'd just add Ps and we'd be fine. >> >> But this would break all your existing users' existing >> chroot setups. That's the question I'm after an answer to: >> what do you (as a distro) think would be acceptable as >> transitional breakage, if anything? > > Yes, but it's not like Fedora'd have choice. Distros have to follow > what upstream does, even if it breaks something else (or they could > revert the "P" patch and get an entirely specular set of bug reports).
Yes, that's why I'm asking what you'd prefer before we change upstream QEMU rather than just picking something randomly and letting you deal with the consequences :-) -- PMM
