On 22.08.2014 21:55, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/22/2014 10:31 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
There are certain cases where repairing a qcow2 image might actually
damage it further (or rather, where repairing it has in fact damaged it
further with the old qcow2 check implementation). This should not
happen, so add a test for these cases.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com>
---
tests/qemu-iotests/104 | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/qemu-iotests/104.out | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/qemu-iotests/group | 1 +
3 files changed, 145 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/104
create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/104.out
diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/104 b/tests/qemu-iotests/104
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..cc6d0b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/104
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+#
+# Test case for repairing qcow2 images which cannot be repaired using
+# the on-disk refcount structures
+#
+# Copyright (C) 2013 Red Hat, Inc.
Welcome to 2014, where we are practically 2/3 through with the year
already :)
Oops *g*
And I thought it was bad when I forgot which day of the week it was...
Max
