On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 01:55:01PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 08/22/2014 10:31 AM, Max Reitz wrote: > > There are certain cases where repairing a qcow2 image might actually > > damage it further (or rather, where repairing it has in fact damaged it > > further with the old qcow2 check implementation). This should not > > happen, so add a test for these cases. > > > > Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com> > > --- > > tests/qemu-iotests/104 | 98 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > tests/qemu-iotests/104.out | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > tests/qemu-iotests/group | 1 + > > 3 files changed, 145 insertions(+) > > create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/104 > > create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/104.out > > > > diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/104 b/tests/qemu-iotests/104 > > new file mode 100755 > > index 0000000..cc6d0b3 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/104 > > @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ > > +#!/bin/bash > > +# > > +# Test case for repairing qcow2 images which cannot be repaired using > > +# the on-disk refcount structures > > +# > > +# Copyright (C) 2013 Red Hat, Inc. > > Welcome to 2014, where we are practically 2/3 through with the year > already :)
It may have been copied from an existing template so maybe the initial copyright is really from 2013. Benoît > > -- > Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 > Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org >
