On (Wed) 06 Aug 2014 [09:27:02], Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Amit Shah <amit.s...@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On (Mon) 04 Aug 2014 [13:33:56], Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Amit Shah <amit.s...@redhat.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > To ensure two virtserialports don't get added to the system with the
> >> > same 'name' parameter, we need to access all the ports on all the
> >> > devices added, and compare the names.
> >> >
> >> > We currently don't have a list of all VirtIOSerial devices added to the
> >> > system. This commit adds a simple linked list in which devices are put
> >> > when they're initialized, and removed when they go away.
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >> > +struct VirtIOSerialDevices {
> >> > + QLIST_HEAD(, VirtIOSerial) devices;
> >> > +} vserdevices;
> >> > +
> >>
> >> Any particular reason for stuffing the list into a struct?
> >
> > Not strictly needed for this patch alone, but I think it's cleaner to
> > keep it this way, and when something else comes up that needs a
> > per-device variable, this list will be around.
>
> Adding the struct when it's needed will be easy, so why pay the
> notational overhead now?
True.
> > Also, this is also the
> > way it's done in the kernel, so that uniformity helps as well.
>
> Two uglies make a pretty?
Hah!
Amit
