On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:14:41 +0100 Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Anthony Liguori <anth...@codemonkey.ws> writes: [...] > Yes. But what's reasonably expected entirely depends on the contract > between the function and its callers. > > I think we need a function that cannot fail and shouldn't used with > untrusted arguments (for what it's worth, that's how we use > qobject_from_jsonf() now). Having related functions with different > contracts is fine with me. I completely agree.
