Il 25/07/2014 18:17, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto: > In favor of your idea OTOH, as you explained, it would work for all > possible ACPI configurations, and not break for a random few ones like > Paolo's approach (talking about patch #2 of that set, the procedural > _PRT is great in any case).
Note that, paradoxically, including the procedural _PRT will cause Igor's approach to fail, and the only way to fix it would be a similar hack. But actually Igor's patches make the dependency on the precise table size much smaller; for example a test like "if (version <= pc-i440fx-2.0) add 1500 bytes of padding to the tables" would work. Paolo
