On 1 July 2014 19:30, Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> wrote: > On 07/01/2014 11:23 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Would a 164LX be a useful (ie non-duplicate) extra resource >> for testing this stuff? That has a 21164 (EV5) in it. I haven't >> tried to boot it for some years, but I can have a try at >> resurrecting it if it would be helpful... > > An ev5 would be a good fallback.
Well, it boots. /proc/cpuinfo claims it's an EV56 variation 7 revision 0. Currently running Debian etch. Let me know if you have anything you want me to run on it... thanks -- PMM
