On 07/01/2014 11:23 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 1 July 2014 18:50, Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote: >> Which glibc version? Better yet, could you throw preprocessed source >> my way? UP1000 box is not in a good shape and I'd rather avoid trying to run >> full glibc builds on it ;-/ > > Would a 164LX be a useful (ie non-duplicate) extra resource > for testing this stuff? That has a 21164 (EV5) in it. I haven't > tried to boot it for some years, but I can have a try at > resurrecting it if it would be helpful...
An ev5 would be a good fallback. r~
