On 10 June 2014 15:03, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > If the flash device is configured with a device-width which is > not equal to the bank-width, indicating that it is actually several > narrow flash devices in parallel, the CFI table should report the > number of blocks and the size of a single device, not of the whole > combined setup. This stops Linux from complaining: > "NOR chip too large to fit in mapping. Attempting to cope..." > > As usual, we retain the old broken but backwards compatible behaviour > when the device-width is not specified. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> > --- > At the moment vexpress is the only board which properly sets device-width > rather than using the back-compat misemulated behaviour...
Kevin, Stefan: since this only affects ARM boards at the moment, I'll put this in via target-arm.next unless you particularly want to put it in through the block queue. thanks -- PMM
