On 10 June 2014 17:48, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > Il 10/06/2014 18:38, Peter Maydell ha scritto: >> Heh. How about: >> * if both bios_name and pflash drive 0 specified, this is an error >> * otherwise use whichever we have >> * (NB that bios_name + pflash drive 1 is a reasonable combination) > > > Yes, it is. > > >> vexpress should do this too, for consistency. > > > If it's okay for you, why not.
We haven't released anything where vexpress supports -bios yet, so it's still fine to change. thanks -- PMM
