On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 19:00 +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 13.05.2014 21:08, schrieb Eric Blake: > > On 05/13/2014 11:36 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: > >> Am 07.05.2014 16:42, schrieb Marcel Apfelbaum: > >>> A NULL value is not added to visitor's stack, but there is no > >>> check for that when the visitor tries to return that value, > >>> leading to Qemu crash. > >>> > >>> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: > >>> Marcel Apfelbaum <marce...@redhat.com> > >> > >> Where does the Rb come from on this v1? Is it in any tree > >> already? > >> > > > > The (weak) R-b was here: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-02/msg02861.html > > Thanks. > > > So Luiz was okay with it too, but his last message seems to be > indicating this needs to be fixed somewhere else, too: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-02/msg05228.html > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-03/msg00217.html > > Can/should that be addressed as a follow-up? Or is there a test case > that breaks? Simple and "popular" test case: the user does not use the -kernel-cmdline parameter. The patch is needed because otherwise the main function will fail if no value is passed by the user to string parameters.
Regarding Luiz's concern, it can be a follow-up as I am not aware of any problem with that. Thanks, Marcel > > Regards, > Andreas >
