On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 19:00 +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 13.05.2014 21:08, schrieb Eric Blake:
> > On 05/13/2014 11:36 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> >> Am 07.05.2014 16:42, schrieb Marcel Apfelbaum:
> >>> A NULL value is not added to visitor's stack, but there is no
> >>> check for that when the visitor tries to return that value,
> >>> leading to Qemu crash.
> >>> 
> >>> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
> >>> Marcel Apfelbaum <marce...@redhat.com>
> >> 
> >> Where does the Rb come from on this v1? Is it in any tree
> >> already?
> >> 
> > 
> > The (weak) R-b was here: 
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-02/msg02861.html
> 
> Thanks.
> > 
> So Luiz was okay with it too, but his last message seems to be
> indicating this needs to be fixed somewhere else, too:
> 
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-02/msg05228.html
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-03/msg00217.html
> 
> Can/should that be addressed as a follow-up? Or is there a test case
> that breaks?
Simple and "popular" test case: the user does not use the -kernel-cmdline 
parameter.
The patch is needed because otherwise the main function will fail
if no value is passed by the user to string parameters. 

Regarding Luiz's concern, it can be a follow-up as I am not aware of
any problem with that.

Thanks,
Marcel






> 
> Regards,
> Andreas
> 




Reply via email to