-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 13.05.2014 21:08, schrieb Eric Blake: > On 05/13/2014 11:36 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Am 07.05.2014 16:42, schrieb Marcel Apfelbaum: >>> A NULL value is not added to visitor's stack, but there is no >>> check for that when the visitor tries to return that value, >>> leading to Qemu crash. >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: >>> Marcel Apfelbaum <marce...@redhat.com> >> >> Where does the Rb come from on this v1? Is it in any tree >> already? >> > > The (weak) R-b was here: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-02/msg02861.html
Thanks. > So Luiz was okay with it too, but his last message seems to be indicating this needs to be fixed somewhere else, too: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-02/msg05228.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-03/msg00217.html Can/should that be addressed as a follow-up? Or is there a test case that breaks? Regards, Andreas - -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTc6EeAAoJEPou0S0+fgE/EZEP/0Demtm8RD/bDXkgSZYq8H7C 6FuPxjrkx2F/5Cot36VWeyGWB9A4GX3xH8+OJAsWdPyiq2ChOVXub/knlfedvBKP et8Y2uub5FoLV3l8fPOy8CCO97erF4ZpZ28L1Br7jeUO+gR/b0/a0c2fj3V5SeMO vgY6or46nBteVTyYtkAVx4Ne3VddNjiJJrgTASJkIFCFicG1VSQn6+YT89qmEx1i JL8bbh5UNQ/hSFgQzl88mge9Udv3Zjp1zmbochhdazmoG6dHy7g0A7TuDkhIqnLX p4uEzerjJo+24z6rX50CRj4zr6jnZtMdSWJF25+hvRGOz0UsHQ8D5OTZfs7qwBN3 Nkzqx/tMGENcNOnivJ3CGu7GhlBBEK3moK885dlZQ8p7w0+agNQDrR0CSMJlI4ck 8LgxcDNfGgnK948ZZNPTAlqOR7ZJV1dNE1fHulPVNS1xSdk2h48xOn8NNncRAwyq bs+45pxwTjp+L5WLF7XLKsVF1hYy4wi5pBhT0w+xTymYoP5aHKRmIhogvJY1b6Wf 5isZQUHUeGiepZ26smYROrrQhO4Q2ZqHKjp3yUNfhHaP7bdZYh9ykPQQZra+9+K/ lXNmzFIj2L+kdl5R6/pn9h3nZDjrWxGd+IreVASseW0RuLZXDivOtBKZJ6ZBAqQd Dx5lbtVnihJl9KRRxQw2 =+B1b -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
