Il 12/05/2014 09:53, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
> Do not do a hard reset for port 92h, keyboard controller, or cf9h soft reset.
> These only reset the CPU.
>
> Reviewed-by: Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
Apart from the question of whether cpu_soft_reset() is the right API for
this: Does this result in guest-visible changes that we need to suppress
for previous machine types?
The changes can be considered bug fixes. If anything did rely on INIT
signals resetting nothing but the CPU (for example old 16-bit code that
wanted to get out of protected mode), it would be broken without these
changes.
Paolo
