On 17 April 2014 04:06, Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Peter Crosthwaite
>> Peter Crosthwaite (4):
>>   util/fifo: Generalise naming scheme
>>   util/fifo: Generalise for common integer widths
>>   ssi: pl022: Send debug info to stderr
>>   ssi: pl022: Convert to use FIFO
>>
> This ones all reviewed so I'm now wondering what Queue to go via. With
> patches 3+4 patching ARM code specifically and the P1 change pattern
> having most of its impact in Zynq land, should it go via target-arm?
> Or would you prefer a FIFO API specific PULL from me?

It's on my set of things to review, but I haven't got to it
yet...

thanks
-- PMM

Reply via email to