On 17 April 2014 04:06, Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Peter Crosthwaite >> Peter Crosthwaite (4): >> util/fifo: Generalise naming scheme >> util/fifo: Generalise for common integer widths >> ssi: pl022: Send debug info to stderr >> ssi: pl022: Convert to use FIFO >> > This ones all reviewed so I'm now wondering what Queue to go via. With > patches 3+4 patching ARM code specifically and the P1 change pattern > having most of its impact in Zynq land, should it go via target-arm? > Or would you prefer a FIFO API specific PULL from me?
It's on my set of things to review, but I haven't got to it yet... thanks -- PMM
