On 04/15/2014 10:51 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Chen Gang <gang.chen.5...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On 04/15/2014 04:49 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>> In future submissions, please send the patches in-reply-to the cover >>> letter, not chained together in-reply-to the previous part. Check out >>> git-send-email --no-chain-reply-to. >>> >> >> OK, thanks. But excuse me, I use thunderbird client to send/recv mail >> (not use git send-mail), so not quit understand what you said. And I >> guess what your meaning is: >> >> - start a new thread "[PATH 0/3]..." >> >> - "[PATH 1/3]..." need "reply all" the "[PATH 0/3]..." >> >> - "[PATH 2/3]..." need "reply all" the "[PATH 0/3]..." >> >> - "[PATH 3/3]..." need "reply all" the "[PATH 0/3]..." >> >> If what I guess is incorrect, please let me know, and it will be better >> to provide more detials. > > Sounds okay. But sending with git-send-email is so much easier... >
I guess so, too (sending with git-send-email is much easier, which I am not quite familiar). I have already familiar with Thunderbird, and at least now, I am not a maintainer, neither a main patch maker. at present, I have no too many patches to process. So Thunderbird is enough to me. :-) Thanks. -- Chen Gang Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed