On 03/26/2014 08:05 AM, Tom Musta wrote: > On 3/25/2014 1:06 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Looking at this a little more closely, why aren't we >> just using the _round_to_zero versions of the float >> to int conversion softfloat functions? (This is how >> we implement fctiwz vs fctiw, for instance.) > > Unfortunately, the softfloat list of these functions is not complete. > Specifically, float32_to_uint64_round_to_zero is missing. I can add it > but this means a bigger patch. Thoughts? > Please do.
r~
