On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 20/03/2014 17:01, BALATON Zoltan ha scritto:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 20/03/2014 16:42, Michael Tokarev ha scritto:
10.03.2014 22:40, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Ping!
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/324674/
Thanks, applied to -trivial.
No, please don't; this needs to be done for new machine types only.
Why? I tried running a Windows XP image that was set up before this
patch and it did not complain about changed hardware. Or is there
another reason I'm missing?
Classes (or anything guest-visible in fact) must never ever be changed for
the same machine type. It's a rule.
The class did not change only the prog interface field after it (which is
guest visible but I think most guests just ignore it). So then what's the
correct way to do it? Do I need to change the patch or can it be merged as
it is the next time a new machine type is added?
Regards,
BALATON Zoltan
