10.03.2014 22:40, BALATON Zoltan wrote: > Ping! > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/324674/ > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, BALATON Zoltan wrote: >> Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <bala...@eik.bme.hu> >> --- >> hw/char/serial-pci.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/hw/char/serial-pci.c b/hw/char/serial-pci.c >> index 991c99f..e662b77 100644 >> --- a/hw/char/serial-pci.c >> +++ b/hw/char/serial-pci.c >> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ static int serial_pci_init(PCIDevice *dev) >> return -1; >> } >> >> + pci->dev.config[PCI_CLASS_PROG] = 0x02; /* 16550 compatible */ >> pci->dev.config[PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN] = 0x01; >> s->irq = pci_allocate_irq(&pci->dev);
Hm. While this is an one-liner indeed, I'm not sure it's the right value. From my pci.ids: C 07 Communication controller 00 Serial controller 00 8250 01 16450 02 16550 03 16650 04 16750 05 16850 06 16950 so it seems correct thing to do. What about multi_serial_pci_init() -- should it too set prog-if like this? Thanks, /mjt