10.03.2014 22:40, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> Ping!
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/324674/
> 
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <bala...@eik.bme.hu>
>> ---
>> hw/char/serial-pci.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/char/serial-pci.c b/hw/char/serial-pci.c
>> index 991c99f..e662b77 100644
>> --- a/hw/char/serial-pci.c
>> +++ b/hw/char/serial-pci.c
>> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ static int serial_pci_init(PCIDevice *dev)
>>         return -1;
>>     }
>>
>> +    pci->dev.config[PCI_CLASS_PROG] = 0x02; /* 16550 compatible */
>>     pci->dev.config[PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN] = 0x01;
>>     s->irq = pci_allocate_irq(&pci->dev);

Hm. While this is an one-liner indeed, I'm not sure it's the right
value.  From my pci.ids:

C 07  Communication controller
        00  Serial controller
                00  8250
                01  16450
                02  16550
                03  16650
                04  16750
                05  16850
                06  16950

so it seems correct thing to do.

What about multi_serial_pci_init() -- should it too set prog-if
like this?

Thanks,

/mjt

Reply via email to