On 18 March 2014 14:27, Marcel Apfelbaum <marce...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 16:05 +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: >> On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 13:57 +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: >> > I'm confused; why doesn't this just result in a compiler >> > error in the other direction when we try to #define >> > MACHINE in QEMU and it's already been defined by >> > the BSD headers? >> Maybe because there is usage of the "MACHINE" define by the BSD >> library? (on Qemu context, of course! - meaning, it shouldn't even be >> exposed in the first place!) > I meant "there is *no* usage of the..."
But we'll still see #define MACHINE something and then later #define MACHINE something-else right? The compiler ought to complain about that, at point of the second #define; use or otherwise of the macro isn't relevant here. thanks -- PMM
