On Mon, 28 Dec 2009, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > This fixes the loading of a stripped kernel with zero malloc disabled. > > *Raises an eyebrow* > > Even though there's different perspectives over whether qemu_malloc(0) > should be allowed, inherited from ambiguity over malloc(0), > realloc(p,0) has always had a standard, well-defined meaning.
No. http://groups.google.com/group/comp.std.c/browse_thread/thread/4e9af8847613d71f/6f75ad22e0768a0b?q=realloc++group:comp.std.c#6f75ad22e0768a0b > One which admittedly differs from malloc(0) :-) -- mailto:av1...@comtv.ru
