Hi Andreas,
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:15 AM, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote:
> diff --git a/target-xtensa/op_helper.c b/target-xtensa/op_helper.c
> index 4265378..8641e5d 100644
> --- a/target-xtensa/op_helper.c
> +++ b/target-xtensa/op_helper.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static void do_unaligned_access(CPUXtensaState *env,
> {
> if (xtensa_option_enabled(env->config,
> XTENSA_OPTION_UNALIGNED_EXCEPTION) &&
> !xtensa_option_enabled(env->config, XTENSA_OPTION_HW_ALIGNMENT))
> {
> - cpu_restore_state(env, retaddr);
> + cpu_restore_state(ENV_GET_CPU(env), retaddr);
In other patches if this series you use CPU(xtensa_env_get_cpu(env)),
why ENV_GET_CPU here?
--
Thanks.
-- Max
