On 7 March 2014 22:01, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: > Am 07.03.2014 21:01, schrieb Stefan Weil: >> Am 07.03.2014 20:42, schrieb Andreas Färber: >>> Am 07.03.2014 20:15, schrieb Stefan Weil: >>>> "%d" or "%x" won't work on hosts where int values are smaller than 64 bit. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <s...@weilnetz.de> >>>> --- >>>> disas/libvixl/a64/disasm-a64.cc | 20 ++++++++++---------- >>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >>> >>> Patch looks correct, but I see no indication that this is a backport >>> from upstream libvixl. Have you submitted it there too? >> >> If I knew how to submit it to libvixl, I'd have done that already. I did >> not find any hint (e-mail address, keyword contrib) in the sources from >> github. Can you help me? > > Google led me to the following: > https://github.com/armvixl/vixl > > v...@arm.com
This is the right email address and git repo, yes. (our disas/libvixl/README gives the github URL, at least.) I would encourage you to email them patches, it will act as a prod for them to get themselves set up to handle incoming contributions properly :-) >> It would also be fine if someone just takes my >> patch and applies it there. > > Hopefully Peter can help; I just remembered someone asking not to apply > spelling fixes to not complicate functional backports. I will apply this patch to target-arm.next. I'm happy that we carry genuine bugfixes to libvixl (hopefully in anticipation of them going away on a future update), it's only non-functional changes I'd rather we don't carry in our tree. thanks -- PMM
