On 03/01/2014 02:05 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 28/02/2014 16:03, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >> On 02/28/2014 02:04 AM, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: >>> On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 15:59 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>> Il 27/02/2014 15:39, Marcel Apfelbaum ha scritto: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Each of them highlights one of the two aspects that, in my opinion, >>>>>>> make >>>>>>> QOM interesting (respectively, unification of interfaces and the >>>>>>> containment tree). >>>>> I was planning to tackle the replacement of the machine from a container >>>>> to an actual object too, however this patch conflicts with my >>>>> series because I already have a QOM Machine object created *always* >>>>> and this patch adds another object *sometimes*. >>>>> >>>>> Is this patch's functionality in use yet? Any idea how to merge those >>>>> ideas? >>>> >>>> pseries simply wants to make /machine implement the FWPathProvider >>>> interface. As long as you have a way for boards to specify a TypeInfo >>>> for /machine, this patch will not get in the way. >>> Thanks Paolo! I'll be aware not to brake this functionality. >>> Marcel >> >> What is the outcome of this discussion for the patches I posted? Do I have >> to wait till you finish that machine properties rework and repost or...? > > Your patches are fine. Who gets in first, wins. The other, rebases. :)
Ok. Understood. Wait and rebase and repost and repeat. Ok ;) Thanks. -- Alexey
