On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 13:20 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > Sorry for bothering again. This is quite simple patchset, it does not touch > a lot and just a small rework. This is v7, v1 was 31/10/2013 (~4 months), I > sent "ping" to v5 5 times (took 2 months to get any attention), there was > no comment that it breaks anything, few people commented that the patchset
"few people", you should name them. And they should ack it if they are ok with it. > is ok, we use it internally for quite a while but it is still not in any > tree but mine. I have other patchsets like that and I am not posting new > ones because I do not really see the point until I figure out what is wrong > with my old patches or with the way I posting them and trying to get > attention. > > If anyone feels ok to "ack" these patches, please do so. Thanks and sorry > again. > > > >> > >>> > >>> Changes: > >>> v7: > >>> * cleaned up a bit of QOM use > >>> > >>> v6: > >>> * removed kvmppc_fixup_cpu() > >>> > >>> v5: > >>> * cleanup > >>> * removed cpustate::kvm_cpu_id > >>> * split into 2 patches - new PPC API and the usage of the API > >>> > >>> > >>> Alexey Kardashevskiy (2): > >>> target-ppc: add PowerPCCPU::cpu_dt_id > >>> target-ppc: spapr: e500: fix to use cpu_dt_id > >>> > >>> hw/intc/openpic_kvm.c | 2 +- > >>> hw/intc/xics.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- > >>> hw/intc/xics_kvm.c | 10 +++++----- > >>> hw/ppc/e500.c | 7 +++++-- > >>> hw/ppc/ppc.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 9 +++++---- > >>> hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c | 6 +++--- > >>> hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c | 14 +++++++------- > >>> target-ppc/cpu-qom.h | 2 ++ > >>> target-ppc/cpu.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > >>> target-ppc/kvm.c | 15 +-------------- > >>> target-ppc/kvm_ppc.h | 6 ------ > >>> target-ppc/translate_init.c | 11 +++++------ > >>> 13 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
