On 12/17/2009 01:15 PM, David Kozub wrote:
On a side note, why is the mask for e_type 0xfffe, allowing both ET_EXEC and ET_DYN? I.e. when would we need it for shared libraries?
-fpie generates an ET_DYN "executable". r~
On 12/17/2009 01:15 PM, David Kozub wrote:
On a side note, why is the mask for e_type 0xfffe, allowing both ET_EXEC and ET_DYN? I.e. when would we need it for shared libraries?
-fpie generates an ET_DYN "executable". r~