On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Richard Henderson wrote:
;;
+ sh4)
+ cpu="sh4"
+ ;;
You don't need this entry. That table is supposed to be for changing the
name. You'd use it if uname returned sh4eb though...
Indeed, I got swayed. Then also "m68k" and "i386" are superfluous there.
As for sh4eb, AFAIK "uname -m" still returns "sh4" only. This leaves us in
a situation similar to mips and arm - we could still want to have qemu for
the other endianness.
On a side note, why is the mask for e_type 0xfffe, allowing both ET_EXEC
and ET_DYN? I.e. when would we need it for shared libraries?
Being new here - what should I do about the patch? Send again, with fixes?
Best regards,
David
