On 11 January 2014 09:34, <pavel.zbits...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Pavel Zbitskiy <pavel.zbits...@gmail.com>
>
> It was broken by 4ce6243dc6216e35b5b691078ffa856463bfa8db,
> where TARGET_CLONE_BACKWARDS was specified instead of
> TARGET_CLONE_BACKWARDS2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Zbitskiy <pavel.zbits...@gmail.com>
> ---
> linux-user/s390x/syscall.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/linux-user/s390x/syscall.h b/linux-user/s390x/syscall.h
> index ea8c304..e5ce30b 100644
> --- a/linux-user/s390x/syscall.h
> +++ b/linux-user/s390x/syscall.h
> @@ -22,4 +22,4 @@ struct target_pt_regs {
>
> #define UNAME_MACHINE "s390x"
>
> -#define TARGET_CLONE_BACKWARDS
> +#define TARGET_CLONE_BACKWARDS2
Yep, kernel config agrees:
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/arch/s390/Kconfig#L99
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
thanks
-- PMM
