On 15 December 2013 20:55, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: > Since you're mentioned by name, should I wait for you to review the > three OMAP parts?
There's nothing particularly omap-specific in them. I kind of think this whole thing is backwards anyway: we should really say "the user can only instantiate devices via command line or monitor that are specifically intended to be hot-pluggable", rather than having an enormous list of devices we flag as not instantiable by the user. Even if someday we manage to make it technically possible to instantiate an omap_i2c device (say) from the command line, it will still be a completely bizarre thing to do because it's only intended to work as a part of the omap SoC. Being able to write board models in something other than C would be nice, but I really think that if we pursue the idea of being able to do it all on the command line we'll just end up with a horrifically confusing command line syntax. thanks -- PMM
