Am 13.12.2013 um 18:10 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> Allow specifying a reference to an existing block device (by name) for
> bdrv_file_open() instead of a filename and/or options.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com>

> @@ -872,6 +873,24 @@ int bdrv_file_open(BlockDriverState **pbs, const char 
> *filename,
>          options = qdict_new();
>      }
>  
> +    if (reference) {
> +        if (filename || qdict_size(options)) {
> +            error_setg(errp, "Cannot reference an existing block device with 
> "
> +                       "additional options or a new filename");
> +            return -EINVAL;
> +        }

I suspect this could in fact be an assertion. Users shouldn't have any
way to provoke a call with a reference _and_ options/filename set.

Doesn't make the code less correct, of course, so:

Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com>

Reply via email to