On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 11:52:28 +0800
Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 2013年12月10日 23:16, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 15:25:07 +0100
> > Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> My objection to your approach is strong because Benoît already sent an
> >> alternative which I believe is less worse because with it, arguments
> >> actually mean what their names tell instead of having additional bools
> >> for "oh, and I said A, but I didn't mean it, I really want B".
> >
> > Current proposal:
> >
> > { 'command': 'block_passwd', 'data': {'*device': 'str',
> > '*node-name': 'str', 'password':
> > 'str'} }
> >
>
> I vote for this.
Ok. As it's clear that I've failed to demonstrate how I think we're
going to move all those commands into the wrong direction, I think it's
time to withdrawn my suggestion.
