On 11 December 2013 10:24, Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> > wrote: >> On 11 December 2013 05:59, Peter Crosthwaite >> <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:10 AM, liguang <lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: >>>> Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> >>> >>> Acked-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> >> >> Why Acked-by rather than Reviewed-by ? >> > > Not 100% myself on the new QOM styles and standards around boards and > SoC. But it is reviewed by me to the best of my knowledge. If that is > enough, please feel free to promote to Reviewed-by.
I'd call that Reviewed-by, yes. Acked-by is just "I don't object to this" which is a sufficiently weak statement that it's not often used... thanks -- PMM
