On Mi, 2013-11-20 at 15:52 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > From: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com> > > This is a virtio-vga device built on top of the virtio-gpu device.
Ah, I see what you use the wrapping for. Hmm. I think you should use a common base class instead, i.e. something like virtio-gpu-base which holds all the common stuff. Both virtio-gpu and virtio-vga can use that as TypeInfo->parent then. This way virtio-vga doesn't have to muck with virtio-gpu internals. virtio-gpu-base can be tagged as abstract class (using .abstract = true) so it will not be instantiated directly. cheers, Gerd
