On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:09:40 -0600 Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/28/2013 11:22 PM, Wenchao Xia wrote: > > >> > > MONITOR_EVENT seems tide to monitor too much, since it will be present > > in qapi-schema, I think Q_EVENT_ or QMP_EVENT_KIND would be better? > > I don't have a strong enough opinion on the bikeshed color. > MONITOR_EVENT implies the event is always associated with delivery over > a monitor; but how else would you receive an event without a monitor? Today QMP is tied to the Monitor, but one of the goals of the QAPI is to untangle them. This would allow for a separate QMP server, which could have QMP only features like session support.
