Il 18/09/2013 11:02, Alex Bligh ha scritto: > Paolo, > > On 18 Sep 2013, at 09:23, Alex Bligh wrote: > >>> Yes, that was my understanding too. Can we do it for 1.7? > > Whilst we are changing the calling semantics, do you think > qemu_coroutine_yield() should also run the timers for the > aio_context? IE should timers always be deferred to the > next qemu_aio_wait() / aio_poll(), or should we make it > so they can run whenever there is a 'schedule' between > coroutines?
No, they should be left for the next aio_poll(). > I suspect making the change would be trivial. Its > implications might not be. Yes, they would not. :) Paolo
